Friday, 2 December 2011

Contemplations on my Multimedia Lesson Plans


To be very honest, this was the second lesson plan I have ever made, so I do not believe it to be very thorough.  In all honesty, I think that because of the situation of all my classes this was perhaps one of my most rushed assignments for this class. But, because of the nature of this assignment, I believe that in not taking the proper time to really consider all the aspects of the ASSURE model scrupulously that one cannot truly complete this assignment correctly. Although, I’ve taken quite some time to debate over the content of this lesson plan, I believe that I have spent too much time on pondering the content, and not enough considering the students, media, or methods I would utilize. In the following, I will discuss my thoughts in general on this project and perhaps how I might have improved it.
This project was geared towards planning a lesson that incorporated many times of media in order to enhance the learning experience of some sort of set of students. And, I think that the objectives of this lesson is plainly pointed out in NET*S standard II that states that “Teachers plan and design effective learning environments and experiences supported by technology” (“NETS”, 2000, II.)  It sounded easy enough, but when it came to the actual planning it was actually much harder than it seemed. Once I had gotten the content somewhat down I felt somewhat lost with where to go from there. How could I analyze learners that did not exist? Do I fabricate a class along with their characteristics and needs? I disliked the idea of fabricating the characteristics, abilities, and needs of my class and kind of wished it was randomly fabricated for us. I felt as if it would be all too easy to fabricate my class in such a way that I would have no big problems with teaching them. Although, it was fun imaging and contemplating the demographics of my class, it just felt unfair that I could choose them. So, you could say that creating a fake class was my favorite and least favorite part of the assignment, because after I had fixed the setting of the class to be as simple as possible for me, the rest of the lesson plan seemed simple enough. And, I will admit that I did not make an effort to make the scenario or lesson too complicated.

 If I had included students with disabilities that were a bit more complicated to deal with, such as ADHD or autism, I think that I would have to change my lesson to include a bit more creativity such as making a song or skit to demonstrate how to combine monomials and polynomials (Collins 2005 Sec.1-2). But, considering the content I felt it somewhat excessive to include such activities. Perhaps I feel this way now because the methods of my current math professors are rubbing off on me, but hopefully in the future my feeling will be more compassionate towards my students. I think that because my students in this scenario are fictional I cannot bring myself to truly make an effort to understand them. But, I feel as if, if they were real, I would make an effort to try to make learning working with polynomials fun. When it comes to using something like the ASSURE model, I believe that it should be used with a particular scenario in mind already, because you cannot create a customized lesson for a class that does not exist. Nor, do I believe that it’s simple to simply create one lesson plan and apply it to all classes. I believe that it should be fitted to each and every class, and done differently with each and every class. An honors class may do very well with the lesson plan that I created, but a more varied class may be bored to death of it. In the case of the more varied class, I would probably assign the skit and make a point to do a majority of the work in class, rather than leave them to work at it on their own at their own pace like I would let an honors class. If I wanted to challenge an honors class, I would probably ask them to make their own digital tutorials utilizing zooburst as a tool. For the more varied class, I would probably do a fast paced game with them.


All in all, I felt rather confused and somewhat flustered with this assignment. I had little problems with the lesson plan content, but I felt somewhat put off at the fact that I had to fabricate the class myself, because the type of class would determine the methods and media I would utilize with the class. So, because I could manipulate the characteristics of the class I kind of felt distanced and did not feel the need to challenge myself or cater to the students, since I had fabricated students that met my standards. Under more realistic situations, I am sure I would have approached the situation completely differently.

Collins, J. (Dec. 8 2005). What Are the 13 Categories of Disability For Special 
           Education  Eligibility?
           Retrieved November 30, 2011, from Ezine Articles website:
      http://ezinearticles.com/?What-Are-the-13-Categories-of-Disability-For-Special-Education-Eligibility?&id=1762111
International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). ISTE National
      Educational Technology Standards (NETS) and Performance Indicators For
     Teachers.Retrieved October 6, 2011, from:
     http://www.iste.org/Libraries/PDFs/NETS_for_Teachers_2000.sflb.ashx

Multimedia Lesson Plan: Working With Monomials and Polynomials

Analyze learners:   
General Characteristics:

7th grade class age range of 10-13 years of age
Total class size: 25
12 Filipinos (8 girls and 4 boys)
8 Chamorros (5 girls and 3 boys)
3 Micronesians (2 boys and 1 girl)
2 Asians (1 Japanese girl 1 Chinese boy)
Two students are asthmatic
5 students are from high SES, 8 students are middle SES, 12 students are upper low SES
5 students have English as a second Language.
All students have access to a computer and internet.

Entry Competencies

Majority of the class grasp the concepts of terms, like terms, monomials, and polynomials. The entire class has mastery of basic addition, subtraction, and multiplication skills. Some students have trouble with the Distributive Property.


8 out of 25 of the students are visual learners
5 out of 25 of the students are a combination of auditory and visual learners
6 out of the 25 of the students are auditory learners
4 out of the 25 of the students are a combination of visual and tactile/kinesthetic learners.
2 out of 25 of the students are tactile/kinesthetic learners.


State Objectives

The 7th grade pre-algebra students will be able to combine monomials and polynomials using addition, subtraction, and multiplication and be able to accurately answer at the very least 18 out of 25 questions accurately in a time span of 20 to 30 minutes.
 
Select, modify, design Methods, Media, & Materials

Media Selection:

*     Dry Erase Board and Markers
*     Teacher created website
*     Worksheets provided in class and online as well
*     Quiz administered online
*     Online Digital Tutorials and videos

Utilize Methods, Media, & Materials

First, I will explain the lesson in person using the Dry Erase board and markers. Then I will give some practice problems in class to solve in groups. Then, for homework I will give worksheets and assign a quiz to be taken online. Prior to this lesson, students have had experience accessing a website created by me that includes a text and graphic representation of the lesson that I taught in class, copies of the homework, and a link to their online quiz, which they will e-mail the results to me. Also included on this website are tutorials created by me that employ text, graphics, and audio. Additionally, I also link useful videos that demonstrate various examples and concepts.

Require Learner Participation

The students are able to retake the online quiz multiple times and are able to access the results of their quizzes each time. This gives them time to practice and review the concepts of the lesson. When they are satisfied with their score they are to take a screenshot of their results and e-mail it to me.

Evaluate and Revise

I will give an in-class 30 minute test of 25 questions concerning the lesson covered. In order to see if my methods were effective, I will see if a majority of the class get at least 18 or more correct out of the 25 questions. So, obviously if a majority of the class do not get at least 18 or more questions right, then my methods are ineffective.

Here is a link to a psuedo version of my class website still in progress:
http://www.wix.com/katie6711/mathclass

These are a Few of my Favorite Technological Tools ~

The following will be my assessment of 8 tools using 3 criteria. I will be rating the tools on a scale from 1 to 5 for each criteria, and a tool's final score will be the average of all three scores.

The ratings for each category are as follows:

  • Efficacy
  1. Does not meet purpose of tool
  2. Some what meets purpose of tool
  3. Adequately meets purpose of tool
  4. More than adequately meets purpose of tool with limitations
  5. More than adequately meets purpose of tool with little to none limitations
  • User-Friendliness
  1. Extremely hard to work with or extremely hard to figure out how to work
  2. Hard to work with or hard to figure out
  3. Somewhat hard to work with or somewhat hard to figure out
  4. Not very hard to work with or not very hard to figure out
  5. Easy to work with or easy to figure out
  • Ease of Access
  1. Very hard to acquire or access tool
  2. Somewhat hard to acquire or access tool
  3. Not that hard to acquire or access tool
  4. Relatively easy to acquire or access tool
  5. Very easy to acquire or access tool

The ratings for the final score are as follows:

5- Extremely Useful   4- Quite Useful    3- Useful    2- Hardly useful    1- Not useful

Tool # 1






What is Moodle?



(Video found from the Moodle main website (www.moodle.org)

My assessment of Moodle based on three criteria :


Tool # 2




What is Mozilla Firefox?




(video from mozilla foxfire main website)
 
My assessment of mozilla firefox based on three criteria:




 Tool #3



 What is Google Apps?



Google accounts is a "unified sign-in system" that allows you access to many google products and services, such as g-mail, google docs, blogger, youtube, and many more. There are so many features that are included with this tool that it's really difficult to really find any fault with it. However, when navigating between features, it is somewhat confusing; usually in order to navigate through features easily, one must already know where what one is looking for to begin with in order to really get any where.

Here is my assessment on Google Apps:



Tool # 4


What is Speech Recognition?

Speech Recognition is basically a speech recognition program that has been built into windows operating systems since windows vista. The most recent version of this can be found in windows 7 if one navigates to the control panel and looks under the "Ease of Access" section. This can be used to conduct task on your pc utilizing preset verbal commands, but is most useful in dictating documents. There are various applications for this program, and is a useful tool for people who are unable to use a keyboard or a mouse. Although some set up is required, and is somewhat tedious and troublesome to go through, it works quite well when considering that it came free with your OS (operating system). 



Here is my assessment on Speech Recognition:

 

Tool # 5


What is Zooburst?


Here is my assessment of Zooburst:


Tool # 6


What is Prezi?




Here is my assessment of Prezi:




Tool # 7

What is Voki? 



(message from the voki website's main page)

Here is my assessment of Voki:

Tool # 8


What is Windows Live Messenger?
Windows Live Messegner is an instant messaging client that provides not only instant text messages sent via web, but also as text messages to user's cellular phones. It also includes audio chatting and video chatting services. It can also send documents, and allows you to share photos simply by dragging them into the chat window. It is attached to an e-mail (whether it be hotmail or others) and will notify you immediately of new e-mails. This is a very useful tool for communicating with others via internet. 

Here is my assessment of Windows Live Messenger: